A few months ago, there was an opening with the CIA for an assassin. After sending some applicants through the background checks, training and testing, they narrowed the candidates down to 2

In the end, both candidates successfully completed the mission, albeit in vastly different ways. The soldier eliminated the target with surgical precision, leaving no trace behind. The young woman, on the other hand, used her cunning and resourcefulness to achieve the same result, but with a fraction of the risk and bloodshed.

Impressed by their respective performances, the CIA faced a dilemma: which candidate to choose? On one hand, the soldier represented the agency’s traditional approach to espionage and covert operations. He was a skilled warrior, capable of carrying out missions with ruthless efficiency. On the other hand, the young woman embodied a new era of espionage, one that relied more on subtlety and manipulation than brute force.

After much deliberation, the CIA ultimately decided to hire both candidates, recognizing the value of their unique skill sets. The soldier would be tasked with high-risk, high-impact missions that required brute force and precision, while the young woman would specialize in covert operations that demanded finesse and discretion.